Why Your Pastor Needs To Blog
You've probably been down the road before, trying to get your pastor to contribute to the church website. However, you've probably gotten the typical response that they're either not comfortable with computers/technology, they don't have the time, or they'd rather "leave it to those who know what they're doing". Most of these variations mean about the same thing: they just really don't see the benefit that could come from it. The irony is that we're working to make more community-based websites that get people involved and talking, and we can't get the church leaders to be a part of it.
However, there are a few pastors that are bucking the trent, like Gary Lamb and Scott Aughtmon, and they're doing it in different ways. Gary's writing has all the energy you'd find in a 6-year-old who just ate a one-pound bag of sugar, and his passion and excitement for the Lord just leap from the pages of his blog. Scott shares random thoughts on things both in the church and in the world that give you a view of his personal interests, but then scatters in "heavy" entries where he really digs deeper into how we live our lives or persue Christ. Both are on my regular reading list, and, even though I live nowhere near their churches, I like keeping up with their writings.
Hypothetically, let's say I just moved down to the Canton, Georgia area, and was looking for a church. And let's say that I did not read or come across Gary's blog because he didn't have one. Then, I might come across the website for Ridge Stone Church, and see their contemporary style and make a visit eventually...at least put it on my list. Or I might not, if I wanted a church with a permanent home, and not one that met in a movie theatre.
Now, let's say I moved down there and again was looking for a church. While looking through church websites, I come across Ridge Stone, leading to Gary's blog. If I liked Gary's high-energy approach, I'd probably put Ridge Stone as one of the first, if not the first, church to check out in the area. However, if I found Gary's exuberance overwhelming, I might cross it off my list.
I want to be clear that there is nothing wrong if some people cross your church off their list. If you're a contemplative and somber individual, you probably wounldn't appreciate Gary's approach very much. That's not saying anything bad about Gary, but as people, we're typically searching for a place where we're most comfortable. And that's comfortable as in "I like it here, where I can make friends with people similar to me, and I want to get involved", not comfortable as in "well, this church won't make me deal with my sins, so that makes things easier". And finding that good fit benefits the church, the congregation and the individuals.
While our church websites can give a lot of basic information about our church and it's approaches (traditional or contemporary, youth or adult focused, key values, etc.), it typically doesn't give you a good impression of the people that make up the church. However, the addition of a pastor's blog (either as a part of the site, or on another service, like Gary and Scott use) can provide insight about the people who make up the church, from the pastor himself directly, to the members of the congregation in the way he referrs to them. It's a personal glimpse into a place that you've never set foot in, and for many people that may be enough to make them comfortable to walk into a building full of strangers.
So, take the time to sit down with your pastor and show them the examples above (or any other pastor blogs that my be more in line with your church's approaches...they're out there if you look for them), and explain the benefits that such a blog can provide. Chances are, once they see the benefit and figure out what they're doing, you're going to have to pry them away from their keyboards.


Timothy, I agree that you should not force the pastor to blog if they're not comfortable with it, but you should at least show them the advantages of doing so. In the end, the decision to do so is theirs.
And, as you'll see, I'm also a big advocate of keeping church websites up to date. There are clearly dangers in not doing so.
You know, it is funny that you made this post. When I saw the new Poll a couple days ago, I saw the option of getting the pastor to blog, and I wanted to comment, but there was no place to.
I do agree that the addition of a pastor's blog to a website has the potential to be a really good thing. However, for the sake of a website, if the pastor really isn't too into doing it, it could be bad for the website and the church (well bad in the sense of visitors turned away - but that could be good in the sense of steering people away from a not-so-good church).
But this brings up another point though. There is no doubt that if a pastor has a blog on a church's website, people will be reading it. It takes diligence and it is another avenue for critique of theology and thought. Some pastors are scared of that, and/or they are too lazy to put in the extra effort to post regularily.
This doesn't make pastoral blogging wrong or unnecessary. I think they should do it. But I know pastors who do as little work as possible and get in the public eye as little as they can. In my opinion, that is usually because of bad theology and more zeal for hunting and sports than for God. These types probably will want nothing to do with blogging and will give every excuse possible for reasons why they shouldn't blog.
Hey Greg,
Thanks for mentioning me and linking to my blog.
My 2 cents on your topic...
I actually don't link to my blog from the church site (Don't look at our church site I need to update it! :)).
Here are some of the reasons I blog...
One reason is to record and share what I am learning while planting this church. My blog is on PlanterPlanet.com, so I am sometimes posting for other planters more than for regular Christ-followers.
The second reason is because I knew search engines love blogs and that the more links you have pointing to your site (link popularity) that the better your search engine ranking will be. When I first typed "pathway church" in Google when we first started we didn't even appear! Now we're listed in the third spot (as of Jan. 2007)! We're also now listed in the #14 spot for "church in Palo Alto" and we weren't on there within the first 4-5 pages for that term before.
So, in that way I'm assuming that people will find the blog before they find our church site. That's why I link to the church site from the blog.
I haven't linked to the blog from the church site, because of it's "church planter" theme, but I do have the link to my blog in the sig file of all my outgoing emails.
Anyway, that's some of my thinking behind my blogging. :)